Current:Home > MyGoogle says it will start blocking Canadian news stories in response to new law -InfinityFinance
Google says it will start blocking Canadian news stories in response to new law
View
Date:2025-04-14 15:11:41
Googles said on Thursday that it will block all links to Canadian news articles for people using its search engine and other services in the country in response to a new law that would compel tech companies to pay publishers for content.
"We have now informed the government that when the law takes effect, we unfortunately will have to remove links to Canadian news from our Search, News and Discover products in Canada," Google executive Kent Walker wrote in a blog post.
It comes a week after Meta vowed its own blackout of Canadian publishers on Facebook and Instagram, calling the law "fundamentally flawed."
The two tech giants have been battling the Canadian government over the law that would force them to negotiate compensation deals with news organizations for distributing links to news stories.
The law, called the Online News Act, passed last week. But it could take months for it to take effect. Once it does, Google and Meta say they will start removing news articles by Canadian news outlets from their services in the country.
Supporters of the legislation have argued that it could provide a much-needed lifeline to the ailing news industry, which has been gutted by Silicon Valley's ironclad control of digital advertising.
According to Canadian government figures, more than 450 news outlets in the country have closed since 2008.
"Digital platforms and social media are now the gateways where people find, read and share news. Because of this, advertising revenues have shifted away from local news and journalists to these gatekeepers, who profit from the sharing and distribution of Canadian news content," government backers of the bill wrote in April.
Government estimates predict that the law would could inject some $329 million into the Canadian news industry, which has been beset by news staff layoffs and other downsizing in recent years.
Canada's law was modeled on a similar effort in Australia, where Meta did block news articles for nearly a week before tense negotiations led Meta and Google to eventually strike deals with news publishers.
A bill to force tech companies to pay publishers is also advancing in California, where the tech industry has levied similar threats of pulling out all news content.
In Canada, both tech platforms have long been against the law, saying the companies are already helping news companies by directing web traffic to their sites. On Facebook and Instagram, news represents a tiny fraction — on Facebook, it's about 3% — of what people see every day.
Google, too, does not consider news articles as essential to its service. So both companies have wagered that it is simply easier to block links to news articles than to start paying news organizations.
While most major publishers in Canada back the new law, outside media observers have not been so sure. Tech writer Casey Newton has argued that a tax on displaying links would "effectively break the internet" if it was applied to the rest of the web. Other critics have pointed to the lack of transparency over who actually would receive cash infusion from the tech companies. Some fear the programs could be hijacked by disinformation sites that learn how to game the system.
Yet press advocates insisted that tech companies retaliating by threatening to systemically remove news articles will be a blow to civil society and the public's understanding of the world.
"At a moment when disinformation swirls in our public discourse, ensuring public access to credible journalism is essential, so it's deeply disappointing to see this decision from Google and Meta," said Liz Woolery, who leads digital policy at PEN America, an organization that supports freedom of expression.
Woolery continued: "As policymakers explore potential solutions to the challenges facing the journalism industry, platforms are free to critique, debate, and offer alternatives, but reducing the public's access to news is never the right answer."
veryGood! (1161)
Related
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Trump's 'stop
Ranking
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Recommendation
DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September